HUMAN SM PATH REPLY QUICK PLEASE

[Guest Gladius]

Guys, so, just like what I wrote.

Which path is better?

Infan > Gladiator

or

Merc > Phalanx?

And please tell me why

[Seraphyre]

Depends on whether you want to dual wield or not, I think. If so, do the second path. And if you wanna do 2h, do the first path.

Gladiator would help a lot as a 2h SM with all of it's 2h skills and crit rate bonus you get from it.

Phalanx has a lot of skills that would help as an SM, dual wielding and such.

[Guest Gladius]

Gladi path 21% crit dmg. But more p.atck (only 200-300 diff due to fighter hearts)

Phalanx path 18% crit dmg. But more p.deff

So, which one do you think is better for dual wielding

[Seraphyre]

Phalanx. If you go Gladiator, you're not going to have hardly any skills that you can use for dual wielding.

[Fifin]

and plus u can get lvl 10 heal from phalanx,

SM have many useless SP later at high lvl, so u can use the rest of SP for 1h skills it makes u can tank sometimes xD

[Bisul]

most human SM goes to infant-gladi sir!

[Guest ~Syn~]

Go to infant > gladi > SM [human only] and you need focused on damage only i think dude! ^_^

But, i think SM [human] are a bad one since need many strike to hit rogue and the item are not cheap. :mellow:

[Guest Gladius]

So... You guys think phalanx path is better? Have you guys met one before?

[Fifin]

So... You guys think phalanx path is better? Have you guys met one before?

I have one,

and its nice ._.

I can tank alone in NH at 106

and do nice damage to the pirates

[Guest Gladius]

Ah ic, so.... What if phalanx path and gladi path r pvp-ing? Which one do you think will win?

[Guest Gladius]

btw, which one is better? 20str or 19 patck?

[Guest ~Syn~]

Human meant to have high damage, so it would be nice you go up to infant>gladi or merchant>knight dude! ;)

But it's still up to u :mellow:

[Guest ~Syn~]

btw, which one is better? 20str or 19 patck?

19 p.atk better on earring and 20 str on ring B)

[Bisul]

if u like to playing in PvP why don't you make elf SM with RK in it's path.

i think human SM is only suitable for GW.

[Elledoora ツ]

can i ask too for SM human :D

its true if earing better use str 20++ than patk 19+?

or acc full patk ?

[MeisjeMoorDenaar]

can i ask too for SM human :D

its true if earing better use str 20++ than patk 19+?

or acc full patk ?

use str 20++ pure(p) for war-mercen-knight-sm

use p.atk HC for war-infant-gladi-sm

[Elledoora ツ]

use str 20++ pure(p) for war-mercen-knight-sm

use p.atk HC for war-infant-gladi-sm

aw, im from infan - gladi , so its better use HC in all acc ryt?

thanks 4 info ;)

[Guest Gladius]

Well... 20 str and 19 patck is almost the same, but... why's str better?

[Guest Gladius]

Err, sorry, I mean patck*

[Guest ~Syn~]

Umm, u can edit your post if you type it wrong <_<

Anyway pure str on item are not good :( cuz if full str on all eq can have lower P.atk then using Mixed P.atk and Str eq B)

Str better then P.A cuz add STRIKE too :blink: and it give amount of P.atk too

But i suggest you use 2x Earing with P.atk [HC] all and use Hathor +15+ Str and Hathor +15+ strike

And your HB neck with P.atk[HC] and HB glove strike

Full STR philo on armor

Can Kynee or Tarintus Helm With +15+ strike or +20+ str

Just my suggestion, peace :P

[Guest Gladius]

Wait, so can you tell me which one is better? str or p.atk? for human SM.

[Guest ~Syn~]

Better mix both of them ;)

[Fifin]

Well... 20 str and 19 patck is almost the same, but... why's str better?

str is better than patk ._.

u might not have a huge patk on the status but it gives a higher damage output, just like int and matk, and str adds some strike too

[Rookie]

how about merc-knight-sm? ;o

[Elledoora ツ]

i think patk 19++ its good but, if u use str 30++ its better than patk 19+

is it ryt? :huh:

[Guest ~Syn~]

i think patk 19++ its good but, if u use str 30++ its better than patk 19+

is it ryt? :huh:

Right :rolleyes: